|
|
Post by Bandage Man on Jul 17, 2016 11:15:05 GMT -5
ahh, not sure where you got that from but i didn't implement any such rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bandage Man on Jul 17, 2016 11:16:16 GMT -5
You got:
3 YELLOW
|
|
|
|
Post by Tomcat Murr on Jul 17, 2016 11:31:39 GMT -5
Trade: Yellow 3 with Player 4.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bandage Man on Jul 17, 2016 11:33:45 GMT -5
You get:
1 GREEN
|
|
|
|
Post by Tomcat Murr on Jul 17, 2016 11:39:37 GMT -5
So, this is tough... I can try player 5 and hope it's something better, or I can stay. But if I stay, I'm relying on Lukas playing his 0 for player 5 to get any Quattro, but then again if I trade, I'm relying on player 5 having something to get a Quattro, too. But I know player 5 isn't a 0. Hm. It's a gamble either way. Give me a minute.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tomcat Murr on Jul 17, 2016 11:41:25 GMT -5
Trade: Green 1 with Player 5.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bandage Man on Jul 17, 2016 11:43:55 GMT -5
You got:
4 RED
|
|
|
|
Post by Tomcat Murr on Jul 17, 2016 11:45:48 GMT -5
My reasoning here is, based on the glitch first trade, I know Lukas has 5 Green and 0 black. He's gonna have to trade at least one of them quite a bit. So, it's kind of luck of the draw whether or not he gets a Quattro. But if I get something I use here, I'll ensure a Quattro - if I don't, he'd block me, anyway. He can't use the Green 1 if he wants the Green 5.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tomcat Murr on Jul 17, 2016 11:46:36 GMT -5
Reveal: 4 Red
|
|
|
|
Post by Tomcat Murr on Jul 17, 2016 12:35:08 GMT -5
Yay! That was tough, and definitely came down to a gamble - but my gamble was that I needed any of a few cards still available (Red 2, Red 4, Green 2...), and made it so that he only had 1 option (Red 2). btw, I wasn't trying to bitch at you when I brought up him using a different card. I wanted to make sure that was OK so I could block him from the Red 3. It definitely helped. But I didn't want to post, "OMG, you mean I can use my Red 3?  !!!" publicly. heh. Sorry about that. |
|
!!!" publicly. heh. Sorry about that.